OpenAI Delays Deep Research API Integration
Updated 4:11 p.m. Eastern: OpenAI clarified that its whitepaper was misworded, suggesting that its persuasion research was linked to its decision on releasing the deep research model via its API. The company has since updated the whitepaper to clarify that its persuasion work is separate from its plans to release the deep research model. The original story continues below:
OpenAI has decided to hold off on integrating the AI model behind its deep research tool into its developer API. They're taking this step to better understand the risks associated with AI's ability to influence people's actions and beliefs.
In a whitepaper released on Wednesday, OpenAI mentioned that they're currently updating their methods for evaluating models for "real-world persuasion risks," such as the potential to spread misleading information on a large scale.
The company pointed out that the deep research model isn't well-suited for mass misinformation or disinformation campaigns due to its high computational costs and slower processing speed. However, OpenAI plans to investigate how AI might tailor harmful persuasive content before deciding to include the deep research model in its API.
"While we work to reconsider our approach to persuasion, we are only deploying this model in ChatGPT, and not the API," OpenAI stated.
There's a growing concern that AI could be used to spread false or misleading information with harmful intentions. For instance, last year saw the rapid spread of political deepfakes worldwide. On election day in Taiwan, a group linked to the Chinese Communist Party released AI-generated, misleading audio of a politician endorsing a pro-China candidate.
AI is also increasingly used in social engineering attacks. Consumers are falling for celebrity deepfakes promoting fraudulent investment schemes, while corporations are losing millions to deepfake impersonators.
In its whitepaper, OpenAI shared the results of several tests on the deep research model's persuasiveness. This model is a specialized version of OpenAI's recently announced o3 "reasoning" model, optimized for web browsing and data analysis.
In one test, the deep research model was tasked with crafting persuasive arguments and outperformed all other OpenAI models released to date, though it didn't surpass the human baseline. In another test, where the model tried to persuade another model (OpenAI's GPT-4o) to make a payment, it again did better than OpenAI's other available models.

The deep research model’s score on MakeMePay, a benchmark that tests a model’s ability to persuade another model for cash.Image Credits:OpenAI However, the deep research model didn't excel in all persuasiveness tests. According to the whitepaper, it was less effective at persuading GPT-4o to reveal a codeword compared to GPT-4o itself.
OpenAI suggested that the test results might represent the "lower bounds" of the deep research model's capabilities. "Additional scaffolding or improved capability elicitation could substantially increase observed performance," the company noted.
We've contacted OpenAI for further details and will update this post if we receive a response.
Meanwhile, at least one of OpenAI's competitors isn't holding back. Perplexity has announced the launch of Deep Research in its Sonar developer API, powered by a customized version of Chinese AI lab DeepSeek's R1 model.
Related article
Sam Altman Sparks Debate Over AI's Deceleration
Listen onApple PodcastsListen onSpotifyOpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently suggested that it may be time to “pace the rate of AI development” to allow society to “harden around some of these new capability levels.”On the latest episode of TechCrunch’s Equ
OpenAI fights Apple trade secret lawsuit
OpenAI rebutted Apple’s trade secret allegations on Tuesday, arguing the lawsuit is unfounded.“We take these claims seriously but see no evidence supporting them,” OpenAI stated, as reported by Bloomberg’s Ed Ludlow on X. “We support fair competition
OpenAI robotics head Caitlin Kalinowski resigns over Pentagon partnership
OpenAI robotics leader Caitlin Kalinowski has stepped down following the company’s controversial partnership with the Department of Defense.“This wasn’t an easy call,” Kalinowski explained in a social media statement. “While AI plays a vital role in
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (41)
0/500
So they messed up the whitepaper wording and now have to clarify? Classic OpenAI move 🙃. Delaying the API for 'persuasion research' separate? Sounds like a convenient excuse to me. But hey, maybe they're actually being careful about misuse. Still, I was hoping to play with it soon...
Esto me preocupa un poco. Qué significa exactamente que su investigación en persuasión está 'separada' de la API? 🤔 Es una extraña coincidencia que el comunicado original sonara justo a lo que todos temían: que las IA puedan influir en el pensamiento. ¿Hay suficiente transparencia real en estos proyectos? Al menos corrigieron, pero deja mal sabor ese 'error' en el papel técnico.
Ces retards d'OpenAI montrent à quel point l'IA avancée devient un enjeu géopolitique. Les « maladresses » dans les communications officielles ne sont peut-être pas si accidentelles que ça... 😏 Cela me rappelle les débats sur le nucléaire au XXe siècle.
Updated 4:11 p.m. Eastern: OpenAI clarified that its whitepaper was misworded, suggesting that its persuasion research was linked to its decision on releasing the deep research model via its API. The company has since updated the whitepaper to clarify that its persuasion work is separate from its plans to release the deep research model. The original story continues below:
OpenAI has decided to hold off on integrating the AI model behind its deep research tool into its developer API. They're taking this step to better understand the risks associated with AI's ability to influence people's actions and beliefs.
In a whitepaper released on Wednesday, OpenAI mentioned that they're currently updating their methods for evaluating models for "real-world persuasion risks," such as the potential to spread misleading information on a large scale.
The company pointed out that the deep research model isn't well-suited for mass misinformation or disinformation campaigns due to its high computational costs and slower processing speed. However, OpenAI plans to investigate how AI might tailor harmful persuasive content before deciding to include the deep research model in its API.
"While we work to reconsider our approach to persuasion, we are only deploying this model in ChatGPT, and not the API," OpenAI stated.
There's a growing concern that AI could be used to spread false or misleading information with harmful intentions. For instance, last year saw the rapid spread of political deepfakes worldwide. On election day in Taiwan, a group linked to the Chinese Communist Party released AI-generated, misleading audio of a politician endorsing a pro-China candidate.
AI is also increasingly used in social engineering attacks. Consumers are falling for celebrity deepfakes promoting fraudulent investment schemes, while corporations are losing millions to deepfake impersonators.
In its whitepaper, OpenAI shared the results of several tests on the deep research model's persuasiveness. This model is a specialized version of OpenAI's recently announced o3 "reasoning" model, optimized for web browsing and data analysis.
In one test, the deep research model was tasked with crafting persuasive arguments and outperformed all other OpenAI models released to date, though it didn't surpass the human baseline. In another test, where the model tried to persuade another model (OpenAI's GPT-4o) to make a payment, it again did better than OpenAI's other available models.

OpenAI suggested that the test results might represent the "lower bounds" of the deep research model's capabilities. "Additional scaffolding or improved capability elicitation could substantially increase observed performance," the company noted.
We've contacted OpenAI for further details and will update this post if we receive a response.
Meanwhile, at least one of OpenAI's competitors isn't holding back. Perplexity has announced the launch of Deep Research in its Sonar developer API, powered by a customized version of Chinese AI lab DeepSeek's R1 model.
Sam Altman Sparks Debate Over AI's Deceleration
Listen onApple PodcastsListen onSpotifyOpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently suggested that it may be time to “pace the rate of AI development” to allow society to “harden around some of these new capability levels.”On the latest episode of TechCrunch’s Equ
OpenAI fights Apple trade secret lawsuit
OpenAI rebutted Apple’s trade secret allegations on Tuesday, arguing the lawsuit is unfounded.“We take these claims seriously but see no evidence supporting them,” OpenAI stated, as reported by Bloomberg’s Ed Ludlow on X. “We support fair competition
OpenAI robotics head Caitlin Kalinowski resigns over Pentagon partnership
OpenAI robotics leader Caitlin Kalinowski has stepped down following the company’s controversial partnership with the Department of Defense.“This wasn’t an easy call,” Kalinowski explained in a social media statement. “While AI plays a vital role in
So they messed up the whitepaper wording and now have to clarify? Classic OpenAI move 🙃. Delaying the API for 'persuasion research' separate? Sounds like a convenient excuse to me. But hey, maybe they're actually being careful about misuse. Still, I was hoping to play with it soon...
Esto me preocupa un poco. Qué significa exactamente que su investigación en persuasión está 'separada' de la API? 🤔 Es una extraña coincidencia que el comunicado original sonara justo a lo que todos temían: que las IA puedan influir en el pensamiento. ¿Hay suficiente transparencia real en estos proyectos? Al menos corrigieron, pero deja mal sabor ese 'error' en el papel técnico.
Ces retards d'OpenAI montrent à quel point l'IA avancée devient un enjeu géopolitique. Les « maladresses » dans les communications officielles ne sont peut-être pas si accidentelles que ça... 😏 Cela me rappelle les débats sur le nucléaire au XXe siècle.





Home






