Home
Indian Court Rules OpenAI's News Training Not Infringing; Temporary Injunction Would Kill Local Models

A judgment has settled the debate over whether AI training should pay for news content in India, delivering a clear outcome. On July 24 local time, the Delhi High Court ruled that OpenAI's use of content from Asian News International (ANI) to train its artificial intelligence model does not constitute copyright infringement.
Judge Amit Bansal outlined two core reasons in the ruling. First, OpenAI's actions fall within the "fair use" exception defined under India's Copyright Act. Second, ANI failed to provide evidence to the court proving that ChatGPT's responses directly copied ANI's copyrighted content. These two points directly undermined the foundation of ANI's lawsuit.
More importantly, the judgment explicitly rejected the request for an injunction. The judge emphasized that issuing a temporary injunction at this stage would not support the development of artificial intelligence, but would instead severely hinder India's emerging large language model projects. If implemented, the injunction would also have widespread negative ripple effects on the public interest—users who freely use ChatGPT in India would feel the impact first. In other words, the court weighed "protecting one content provider" against "harming the entire industry and the public" and ultimately chose the latter.
This is not an isolated case. Previously, media outlets such as The New York Times filed similar lawsuits against OpenAI in the United States, and those cases are still under review. As similar disputes proceed independently across different jurisdictions, India's ruling has at least opened a gap in the accusation that "training equals infringement."
Related article
ByteDance’s Seed launches global campus drive, offering virtual shares to win top large model talent
In the competitive landscape of large language models, securing top-tier talent remains the most critical strategic asset.On April 1st, ByteDance announced the launch of its Seed global campus recruitment initiative, part of its large model talent de
Suno to Watermark Songs Amid Legal Battles
Suno, the platform enabling users to generate AI-created music, has unveiled new features to label platform-produced tracks, restrict downloads, and update community standards to curb unauthorized replicas. These updates arrive as Suno confronts mult
Musk Admits Grok Build Leaked User Code, Promises to Erase All Historical Data
Elon Musk directly addressed the privacy controversy surrounding Grok Build, beginning with a simple "True" to confirm the incident's validity. He pledged that all user data previously uploaded to SpaceXAI would be permanently erased, stating, "not a
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (0)
0/500

A judgment has settled the debate over whether AI training should pay for news content in India, delivering a clear outcome. On July 24 local time, the Delhi High Court ruled that OpenAI's use of content from Asian News International (ANI) to train its artificial intelligence model does not constitute copyright infringement.
Judge Amit Bansal outlined two core reasons in the ruling. First, OpenAI's actions fall within the "fair use" exception defined under India's Copyright Act. Second, ANI failed to provide evidence to the court proving that ChatGPT's responses directly copied ANI's copyrighted content. These two points directly undermined the foundation of ANI's lawsuit.
More importantly, the judgment explicitly rejected the request for an injunction. The judge emphasized that issuing a temporary injunction at this stage would not support the development of artificial intelligence, but would instead severely hinder India's emerging large language model projects. If implemented, the injunction would also have widespread negative ripple effects on the public interest—users who freely use ChatGPT in India would feel the impact first. In other words, the court weighed "protecting one content provider" against "harming the entire industry and the public" and ultimately chose the latter.
This is not an isolated case. Previously, media outlets such as The New York Times filed similar lawsuits against OpenAI in the United States, and those cases are still under review. As similar disputes proceed independently across different jurisdictions, India's ruling has at least opened a gap in the accusation that "training equals infringement."
ByteDance’s Seed launches global campus drive, offering virtual shares to win top large model talent
In the competitive landscape of large language models, securing top-tier talent remains the most critical strategic asset.On April 1st, ByteDance announced the launch of its Seed global campus recruitment initiative, part of its large model talent de
Suno to Watermark Songs Amid Legal Battles
Suno, the platform enabling users to generate AI-created music, has unveiled new features to label platform-produced tracks, restrict downloads, and update community standards to curb unauthorized replicas. These updates arrive as Suno confronts mult
Musk Admits Grok Build Leaked User Code, Promises to Erase All Historical Data
Elon Musk directly addressed the privacy controversy surrounding Grok Build, beginning with a simple "True" to confirm the incident's validity. He pledged that all user data previously uploaded to SpaceXAI would be permanently erased, stating, "not a











