AI Vibe Coding: The Latest Trend Not Suited for All - Here's Why

The concept of "vibe coding" has been making waves in the coding community since early February, when Andrej Karpathy, a notable figure with a Ph.D. from Stanford and experience at Tesla and OpenAI, introduced it via a post on X (formerly Twitter). Now leading an educational startup called Eureka Labs, Karpathy described vibe coding as a method where developers fully immerse themselves in the flow, letting AI handle much of the coding process.
Vibe coding essentially allows developers to bypass traditional coding practices and go with the flow, relying heavily on AI tools. Karpathy explained that with today's advanced AI capabilities, he can interact with tools like Cursor Composer and SuperWhisper, minimizing his need to touch the keyboard. He even admits to asking for simple adjustments like reducing sidebar padding, showcasing how AI can handle minor tweaks effortlessly.
However, this approach isn't without its risks. Karpathy's method of accepting all AI-generated code without reviewing it could be dangerous for less experienced programmers who might not have the skills to rectify any errors introduced by the AI. He also noted that when encountering errors, he often copies and pastes them into the AI without additional context, trusting the AI to resolve them. While this can work for someone with his expertise, it's a risky strategy for those new to coding.
Karpathy also highlighted that vibe coding is suitable for quick, throwaway projects where the code doesn't need to be fully understood or maintained long-term. He finds it amusing and efficient for building prototypes, but acknowledges that it's not ideal for production-ready software.
Rachel Wolan, the chief product officer at Webflow, experimented with vibe coding over a weekend. She found that AI was excellent for setting up backends quickly, iterating rapidly, and automatically detecting errors. However, she also noted several limitations, such as clunky interfaces, slow precise edits, and challenges in creating custom designs. Wolan emphasized that while AI can help stand up a prototype, it won't replace skilled software engineers or production-grade platforms like Webflow.
In her experience, vibe coding was fast and flexible, lowering the barrier to building software. However, she cautioned that it's not a shortcut to software development but rather a new tool that can augment the work of product managers, designers, and engineers.
From my perspective, vibe coding is an intriguing concept that reflects a more relaxed, stream-of-consciousness approach to coding, akin to creative writing. While it's been around in various forms, Karpathy's term gives it a catchy name. It's particularly useful for experienced developers who can harness AI for routine tasks, freeing up time for more complex coding challenges. However, it's not a replacement for the meticulous work required to create fully functional, deployable software.
Vibe coding is a fun and productive technique, but it's crucial to maintain a balance between AI assistance and human oversight. It's not a shortcut to creating software products, which still require robust engineering skills and product management expertise.
The term "vibe coding" is likely to stick around due to its catchy nature, but it's important not to confuse it with no-code or low-code platforms. It's a tool for experienced developers to boost productivity, not a solution for creating complete software products.
What are your thoughts on vibe coding? Have you tried using AI-driven coding assistants? Do you find them helpful or frustrating? How do you balance AI assistance with maintaining control over your projects? Let us know in the comments below.
You can follow my day-to-day project updates on social media. Be sure to subscribe to my weekly update newsletter, and follow me on Twitter/X at @DavidGewirtz, on Facebook at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz, on Instagram at Instagram.com/DavidGewirtz, on Bluesky at @DavidGewirtz.com, and on YouTube at YouTube.com/DavidGewirtzTV.
Related article
Swedish AI Startup Lovable Eyes $13.2 Billion Valuation After Major Funding Round
As AI-driven coding tools gain traction, Swedish startup Lovable has secured a major funding round. The company aims to raise $3 billion, potentially boosting its valuation to $13.2 billion—double the $6.6 billion recorded last December. Menlo Ventur
Google Tests Remy AI Agent for Gemini as Focus Shifts to User Control
According to Business Insider, Google is testing Remy, a new AI personal agent for Gemini. This tool aims to execute tasks on behalf of users, streamlining both professional workflows and daily routines.Currently, Remy is undergoing testing in an int
How to fix Core Web Vitals for better SEO rankings
Streamline Report Card Comments with AI ToolsIntroductionAI Tools for Generating Report Card CommentsMagic SchoolAlmanac AIChat GPTUsing Magic School to Generate Report Card CommentsLogging into Magic SchoolSelecting the Report Card Comments ToolCust
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (55)
0/500
I'm honestly not surprised this 'vibe coding' thing is getting hyped up—Karpathy's name alone guarantees that. But come on, coding by 'vibe'? That sounds like a recipe for debugging nightmares. 😅 Are we really going to pretend intuition beats structured thinking in production? Would love to see proponents explain this to a team that's just spent 3 hours fixing a silent bug someone 'vibed' into existence.
最近のAIプログラミング手法ってこんなに変わるんだね。カーパシーの記事、すごく説得力あるけど、「雰囲気コーディング」って本当に全員に合うのかな?私はまだ手書きの論理フローを信じるタイプだし😅 AIは便利だけど、基本を忘れちゃダメだよね。
C'est quoi ce vibe coding ? J'ai lu l'article et franchement, ça semble cool mais super niche. Karpathy a l'air d'un génie, mais est-ce que ça va vraiment changer la donne ou juste un buzz temporaire ? 🤔
Vibe coding sounds cool, but I’m skeptical—feels like a trendy buzzword that’ll fade fast. 😕 Karpathy’s got cred, but is this really practical for most devs?

The concept of "vibe coding" has been making waves in the coding community since early February, when Andrej Karpathy, a notable figure with a Ph.D. from Stanford and experience at Tesla and OpenAI, introduced it via a post on X (formerly Twitter). Now leading an educational startup called Eureka Labs, Karpathy described vibe coding as a method where developers fully immerse themselves in the flow, letting AI handle much of the coding process.
Vibe coding essentially allows developers to bypass traditional coding practices and go with the flow, relying heavily on AI tools. Karpathy explained that with today's advanced AI capabilities, he can interact with tools like Cursor Composer and SuperWhisper, minimizing his need to touch the keyboard. He even admits to asking for simple adjustments like reducing sidebar padding, showcasing how AI can handle minor tweaks effortlessly.
However, this approach isn't without its risks. Karpathy's method of accepting all AI-generated code without reviewing it could be dangerous for less experienced programmers who might not have the skills to rectify any errors introduced by the AI. He also noted that when encountering errors, he often copies and pastes them into the AI without additional context, trusting the AI to resolve them. While this can work for someone with his expertise, it's a risky strategy for those new to coding.
Karpathy also highlighted that vibe coding is suitable for quick, throwaway projects where the code doesn't need to be fully understood or maintained long-term. He finds it amusing and efficient for building prototypes, but acknowledges that it's not ideal for production-ready software.
Rachel Wolan, the chief product officer at Webflow, experimented with vibe coding over a weekend. She found that AI was excellent for setting up backends quickly, iterating rapidly, and automatically detecting errors. However, she also noted several limitations, such as clunky interfaces, slow precise edits, and challenges in creating custom designs. Wolan emphasized that while AI can help stand up a prototype, it won't replace skilled software engineers or production-grade platforms like Webflow.
In her experience, vibe coding was fast and flexible, lowering the barrier to building software. However, she cautioned that it's not a shortcut to software development but rather a new tool that can augment the work of product managers, designers, and engineers.
From my perspective, vibe coding is an intriguing concept that reflects a more relaxed, stream-of-consciousness approach to coding, akin to creative writing. While it's been around in various forms, Karpathy's term gives it a catchy name. It's particularly useful for experienced developers who can harness AI for routine tasks, freeing up time for more complex coding challenges. However, it's not a replacement for the meticulous work required to create fully functional, deployable software.
Vibe coding is a fun and productive technique, but it's crucial to maintain a balance between AI assistance and human oversight. It's not a shortcut to creating software products, which still require robust engineering skills and product management expertise.
The term "vibe coding" is likely to stick around due to its catchy nature, but it's important not to confuse it with no-code or low-code platforms. It's a tool for experienced developers to boost productivity, not a solution for creating complete software products.
What are your thoughts on vibe coding? Have you tried using AI-driven coding assistants? Do you find them helpful or frustrating? How do you balance AI assistance with maintaining control over your projects? Let us know in the comments below.
You can follow my day-to-day project updates on social media. Be sure to subscribe to my weekly update newsletter, and follow me on Twitter/X at @DavidGewirtz, on Facebook at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz, on Instagram at Instagram.com/DavidGewirtz, on Bluesky at @DavidGewirtz.com, and on YouTube at YouTube.com/DavidGewirtzTV.
Swedish AI Startup Lovable Eyes $13.2 Billion Valuation After Major Funding Round
As AI-driven coding tools gain traction, Swedish startup Lovable has secured a major funding round. The company aims to raise $3 billion, potentially boosting its valuation to $13.2 billion—double the $6.6 billion recorded last December. Menlo Ventur
How to fix Core Web Vitals for better SEO rankings
Streamline Report Card Comments with AI ToolsIntroductionAI Tools for Generating Report Card CommentsMagic SchoolAlmanac AIChat GPTUsing Magic School to Generate Report Card CommentsLogging into Magic SchoolSelecting the Report Card Comments ToolCust
I'm honestly not surprised this 'vibe coding' thing is getting hyped up—Karpathy's name alone guarantees that. But come on, coding by 'vibe'? That sounds like a recipe for debugging nightmares. 😅 Are we really going to pretend intuition beats structured thinking in production? Would love to see proponents explain this to a team that's just spent 3 hours fixing a silent bug someone 'vibed' into existence.
最近のAIプログラミング手法ってこんなに変わるんだね。カーパシーの記事、すごく説得力あるけど、「雰囲気コーディング」って本当に全員に合うのかな?私はまだ手書きの論理フローを信じるタイプだし😅 AIは便利だけど、基本を忘れちゃダメだよね。
C'est quoi ce vibe coding ? J'ai lu l'article et franchement, ça semble cool mais super niche. Karpathy a l'air d'un génie, mais est-ce que ça va vraiment changer la donne ou juste un buzz temporaire ? 🤔
Vibe coding sounds cool, but I’m skeptical—feels like a trendy buzzword that’ll fade fast. 😕 Karpathy’s got cred, but is this really practical for most devs?





Home






