EU AI Act Draft Offers Lenient Rules for Big Tech AI Models
As the May deadline approaches for finalizing guidelines under the EU AI Act, authorities have released a third and likely final draft of the Code of Practice for general purpose AI (GPAI) providers. Developed since last year, this updated version comes alongside a dedicated platform to improve accessibility. Stakeholders can submit written feedback until March 30, 2025.
Key Aspects of the Draft Code
The EU's risk-based AI framework imposes specific requirements on major AI developers regarding transparency, copyright compliance, and risk management. This Code helps GPAI creators understand obligations and avoid potential sanctions reaching up to 3% of global revenue for violations.
Streamlined Structure
The latest revision presents a more focused framework with refined commitments, incorporating feedback from December's second draft. Additional consultations will further refine the guidelines before final adoption, with experts aiming for enhanced clarity in the definitive version.
The document organizes requirements into several critical areas:
- Core commitments for GPAI providers
- Detailed transparency protocols
- Copyright compliance measures
- Safety and security obligations (specifically for high-risk GPAISR models)
Transparency Measures
The guidance includes sample documentation templates to help downstream implementers access necessary compliance information. However, contentious language around copyright compliance continues to generate debate.
Copyright Concerns
The draft employs qualifiers like "reasonable measures" regarding web crawling practices and copyright protection, potentially allowing significant leeway. Earlier stronger provisions about direct complaint resolution have been softened, now only requiring designated points of contact.
Notably, the text permits GPAI providers to disregard complaints deemed "manifestly unfounded or excessive" - raising concerns about automated copyright detection systems being ignored.
Safety Requirements
The EU AI Act's safety evaluations currently apply only to exceptionally powerful models (exceeding 10^25 FLOPs). Recent feedback has led to further narrowing of some recommended security measures.
Political Context
The draft emerges amid mounting U.S. criticism of European AI regulation. Recent comments from the Trump administration emphasized prioritizing AI development over safeguards, warning against regulatory overreach potentially stifling innovation.
EU policy shifts include shelving the AI Liability Directive and proposing regulatory simplification measures. However, with the AI Act implementation ongoing, balancing robust oversight with industry viability remains challenging.
Industry Perspectives
Prominent GPAI developer Mistral has publicly struggled with certain technical compliance requirements, working closely with regulators to find feasible solutions.
Regulatory Horizon
The European Commission's AI Office is concurrently developing supplementary guidance to clarify GPAI definitions and responsibilities. These forthcoming interpretations may significantly influence the practical implementation of the AI Act.
Related article
How to fix Core Web Vitals for better SEO rankings
How to Build a Free Website: Free Domain, Hosting & AI Website BuilderTable of ContentsIntroductionAI Website Builder 1: Hookous AIStep 1: Sign UpStep 2: Choose Business Type/NicheStep 3: Select ServicesStep 4: Define Website GoalsStep 5: Enter Busin
Apple, Google Partner With Anthropic to Address 27-Year-Old Vulnerability via Glass Wing Protection
As artificial intelligence advances rapidly in code generation and logical reasoning, the cybersecurity landscape faces unprecedented challenges. Recently, the prominent AI startup Anthropic officially launched a cross-industry collaboration called *
OpenAI Chief Scientist Addresses AI Reasoning Transparency Debate: Complexity Steady, No Sudden Jump
On September 2, Jakub Pachocki, OpenAI’s Chief Scientist, addressed public concerns on X regarding the AI model Astra, clarifying claims that it operates without oversight and lacks transparent reasoning.Why the Controversy Erupted: Deep Recurrence O
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (2)
0/500
빅테크 규제가 이렇게 관대할 줄이야... EU AI 법안 초안을 보니 오히려 대기업들이 더 유리해지는 느낌이에요 🤔 GPT-4 같은 모델이 실제로 안전할지 의문이 드네요. 이런 정책이 결국 소규모 AI 스타트업에게는 불리하게 작용하지 않을까 걱정됩니다.
As the May deadline approaches for finalizing guidelines under the EU AI Act, authorities have released a third and likely final draft of the Code of Practice for general purpose AI (GPAI) providers. Developed since last year, this updated version comes alongside a dedicated platform to improve accessibility. Stakeholders can submit written feedback until March 30, 2025.
Key Aspects of the Draft Code
The EU's risk-based AI framework imposes specific requirements on major AI developers regarding transparency, copyright compliance, and risk management. This Code helps GPAI creators understand obligations and avoid potential sanctions reaching up to 3% of global revenue for violations.
Streamlined Structure
The latest revision presents a more focused framework with refined commitments, incorporating feedback from December's second draft. Additional consultations will further refine the guidelines before final adoption, with experts aiming for enhanced clarity in the definitive version.
The document organizes requirements into several critical areas:
- Core commitments for GPAI providers
- Detailed transparency protocols
- Copyright compliance measures
- Safety and security obligations (specifically for high-risk GPAISR models)
Transparency Measures
The guidance includes sample documentation templates to help downstream implementers access necessary compliance information. However, contentious language around copyright compliance continues to generate debate.
Copyright Concerns
The draft employs qualifiers like "reasonable measures" regarding web crawling practices and copyright protection, potentially allowing significant leeway. Earlier stronger provisions about direct complaint resolution have been softened, now only requiring designated points of contact.
Notably, the text permits GPAI providers to disregard complaints deemed "manifestly unfounded or excessive" - raising concerns about automated copyright detection systems being ignored.
Safety Requirements
The EU AI Act's safety evaluations currently apply only to exceptionally powerful models (exceeding 10^25 FLOPs). Recent feedback has led to further narrowing of some recommended security measures.
Political Context
The draft emerges amid mounting U.S. criticism of European AI regulation. Recent comments from the Trump administration emphasized prioritizing AI development over safeguards, warning against regulatory overreach potentially stifling innovation.
EU policy shifts include shelving the AI Liability Directive and proposing regulatory simplification measures. However, with the AI Act implementation ongoing, balancing robust oversight with industry viability remains challenging.
Industry Perspectives
Prominent GPAI developer Mistral has publicly struggled with certain technical compliance requirements, working closely with regulators to find feasible solutions.
Regulatory Horizon
The European Commission's AI Office is concurrently developing supplementary guidance to clarify GPAI definitions and responsibilities. These forthcoming interpretations may significantly influence the practical implementation of the AI Act.
How to fix Core Web Vitals for better SEO rankings
How to Build a Free Website: Free Domain, Hosting & AI Website BuilderTable of ContentsIntroductionAI Website Builder 1: Hookous AIStep 1: Sign UpStep 2: Choose Business Type/NicheStep 3: Select ServicesStep 4: Define Website GoalsStep 5: Enter Busin
Apple, Google Partner With Anthropic to Address 27-Year-Old Vulnerability via Glass Wing Protection
As artificial intelligence advances rapidly in code generation and logical reasoning, the cybersecurity landscape faces unprecedented challenges. Recently, the prominent AI startup Anthropic officially launched a cross-industry collaboration called *
OpenAI Chief Scientist Addresses AI Reasoning Transparency Debate: Complexity Steady, No Sudden Jump
On September 2, Jakub Pachocki, OpenAI’s Chief Scientist, addressed public concerns on X regarding the AI model Astra, clarifying claims that it operates without oversight and lacks transparent reasoning.Why the Controversy Erupted: Deep Recurrence O
빅테크 규제가 이렇게 관대할 줄이야... EU AI 법안 초안을 보니 오히려 대기업들이 더 유리해지는 느낌이에요 🤔 GPT-4 같은 모델이 실제로 안전할지 의문이 드네요. 이런 정책이 결국 소규모 AI 스타트업에게는 불리하게 작용하지 않을까 걱정됩니다.





Home






