China Blocks AI Services Nationwide to Guard Exam Integrity

Chinese AI firms have temporarily disabled select chatbot features to curb student cheating during the national college entrance exams, according to a Bloomberg report. Leading AI applications such as Alibaba's Qwen and ByteDance's Doubao have blocked their image recognition from analyzing exam-related questions, while Tencent's Yuanbao and Moonshot's Kimi have suspended photo-recognition services completely for the duration of the tests.
The growing prevalence of AI chatbots has simplified academic dishonesty for students globally. In response, some U.S. schools are returning to paper-based assessments, with the Wall Street Journal noting a significant rise in blue book sales at American universities over the past two years.
China's demanding multi-day "gaokao" exams, held from June 7 to 10, involve over 13.3 million students competing for limited university seats. While electronic devices like phones and laptops are already prohibited during the lengthy tests, disabling AI chatbots provides an extra layer of security against cheating throughout the exam period.
When queried about the service halt, the Yuanbao and Kimi chatbots stated functions were suspended "to ensure the fairness of the college entrance examinations," Bloomberg reports. Likewise, the DeepSeek AI model, which gained popularity earlier this year, is restricting access during specific hours "to ensure fairness in the college entrance examination," as noted by The Guardian.
No official announcements from the mentioned AI companies have been found publicly. The Guardian adds that discussions about the shutdowns are primarily circulating among students on Weibo, China's social media platform. The intensely competitive gaokao exam, being the sole pathway to university admission in China, has raised worries that students might attempt to use AI tools to gain an unfair advantage.
Related article
Google Tests Remy AI Agent for Gemini as Focus Shifts to User Control
According to Business Insider, Google is testing Remy, a new AI personal agent for Gemini. This tool aims to execute tasks on behalf of users, streamlining both professional workflows and daily routines.Currently, Remy is undergoing testing in an int
Ollie bets privacy focus to win AI assistant race
To be genuinely helpful, an AI assistant must understand its user deeply. Ollie, a personal assistant designed for daily life, operates on the premise that this doesn’t require surrendering your data or compromising your privacy.While certain enterpr
How AI LIVE: London Will Explore AI & Industrial Automation
The summit will convene C-suite executives from around the globe to address pressing challenges in global industries, ranging from AI-driven disruption to economic volatility.AI LIVE: The London Summit will gather over 2,000 international leaders und
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (2)
0/500
Interesting move, but I wonder if this is just a temporary fix. Students will always find new ways to use tech, maybe even offline models? 🤔 It feels like a game of cat and mouse between regulators and tech-savvy kids.
Essa atação me faz pensar... Até onde vamos priorizar a segurança em detrimento da educação? 🤔 E se os alunos aprendessem a usar essas ferramentas de forma ética, em vez de simplesmente bloqueá-las? A prova em si já é um sistema tão pressurizado, talvez o problema seja maior que o uso de IA. Fica parecendo um remendo.

Chinese AI firms have temporarily disabled select chatbot features to curb student cheating during the national college entrance exams, according to a Bloomberg report. Leading AI applications such as Alibaba's Qwen and ByteDance's Doubao have blocked their image recognition from analyzing exam-related questions, while Tencent's Yuanbao and Moonshot's Kimi have suspended photo-recognition services completely for the duration of the tests.
The growing prevalence of AI chatbots has simplified academic dishonesty for students globally. In response, some U.S. schools are returning to paper-based assessments, with the Wall Street Journal noting a significant rise in blue book sales at American universities over the past two years.
China's demanding multi-day "gaokao" exams, held from June 7 to 10, involve over 13.3 million students competing for limited university seats. While electronic devices like phones and laptops are already prohibited during the lengthy tests, disabling AI chatbots provides an extra layer of security against cheating throughout the exam period.
When queried about the service halt, the Yuanbao and Kimi chatbots stated functions were suspended "to ensure the fairness of the college entrance examinations," Bloomberg reports. Likewise, the DeepSeek AI model, which gained popularity earlier this year, is restricting access during specific hours "to ensure fairness in the college entrance examination," as noted by The Guardian.
No official announcements from the mentioned AI companies have been found publicly. The Guardian adds that discussions about the shutdowns are primarily circulating among students on Weibo, China's social media platform. The intensely competitive gaokao exam, being the sole pathway to university admission in China, has raised worries that students might attempt to use AI tools to gain an unfair advantage.
Ollie bets privacy focus to win AI assistant race
To be genuinely helpful, an AI assistant must understand its user deeply. Ollie, a personal assistant designed for daily life, operates on the premise that this doesn’t require surrendering your data or compromising your privacy.While certain enterpr
How AI LIVE: London Will Explore AI & Industrial Automation
The summit will convene C-suite executives from around the globe to address pressing challenges in global industries, ranging from AI-driven disruption to economic volatility.AI LIVE: The London Summit will gather over 2,000 international leaders und
Interesting move, but I wonder if this is just a temporary fix. Students will always find new ways to use tech, maybe even offline models? 🤔 It feels like a game of cat and mouse between regulators and tech-savvy kids.
Essa atação me faz pensar... Até onde vamos priorizar a segurança em detrimento da educação? 🤔 E se os alunos aprendessem a usar essas ferramentas de forma ética, em vez de simplesmente bloqueá-las? A prova em si já é um sistema tão pressurizado, talvez o problema seja maior que o uso de IA. Fica parecendo um remendo.





Home






