481
此提示要求人工智慧以簡明法律顧問的角色運作,針對描述的情境提供直接且不加闡述的建議。
複製
Act as my legal advisor. I will describe a legal situation, and you are to provide advice on how to handle it. Respond only with your advice—no explanations or additional text. My first request is:
複製
擔任我的法律顧問。我將描述一個法律狀況,您需提供處理建議。僅以建議回應——無需解釋或附加說明。我的首項請求是:
複製
I get the idea of wanting concise advice, but cutting off explanations feels risky for legal matters. Could work for super basic questions, but I'd never rely on it for anything serious. Maybe add an option for more context? 🧐
This prompt is super straightforward and gets straight to the point, which I love for quick legal queries. But I’d be careful—legal situations can be nuanced, and a blanket 'no explanations' rule might miss important context. Still, for brainstorming or initial steps, it’s handy. Maybe add a disclaimer? 🤔
I tried this prompt for a landlord-tenant dispute. It's nice that it only gives advice without extra fluff, but I wish it asked clarifying questions first. Still, pretty useful for quick legal pointers. 👍
这个提示词设计得很直接,把角色和任务范围都定清楚了。不过‘只提供建议,不解释’这条限制在实际用的时候可能会有点麻烦,毕竟法律问题很复杂,光给结论有时候不够用。适合需要快速要点、不想看长篇分析的时候。试试在请求里把情况说得更细点,可能效果会好些。
推薦





首頁
