486
이 프롬프트는 AI가 간결한 법률 고문 역할을 수행하도록 지시하며, 제시된 시나리오에 대해 직접적이고 상세히 설명하지 않은 조언을 제공합니다.
복사
Act as my legal advisor. I will describe a legal situation, and you are to provide advice on how to handle it. Respond only with your advice—no explanations or additional text. My first request is:
복사
저의 법률 고문 역할을 수행해 주십시오. 제가 법적 상황을 설명하면, 그에 대한 처리 방안에 대한 조언을 제공해 주셔야 합니다. 설명이나 추가 텍스트 없이 오직 조언만 답변해 주십시오. 첫 번째 요청은 다음과 같습니다:
복사
I get the idea of wanting concise advice, but cutting off explanations feels risky for legal matters. Could work for super basic questions, but I'd never rely on it for anything serious. Maybe add an option for more context? 🧐
This prompt is super straightforward and gets straight to the point, which I love for quick legal queries. But I’d be careful—legal situations can be nuanced, and a blanket 'no explanations' rule might miss important context. Still, for brainstorming or initial steps, it’s handy. Maybe add a disclaimer? 🤔
I tried this prompt for a landlord-tenant dispute. It's nice that it only gives advice without extra fluff, but I wish it asked clarifying questions first. Still, pretty useful for quick legal pointers. 👍
这个提示词设计得很直接,把角色和任务范围都定清楚了。不过‘只提供建议,不解释’这条限制在实际用的时候可能会有点麻烦,毕竟法律问题很复杂,光给结论有时候不够用。适合需要快速要点、不想看长篇分析的时候。试试在请求里把情况说得更细点,可能效果会好些。
추천





집
